Headless CMS VS Traditional CMS - What is the main difference?

Blog Details

Headless CMS VS Traditional CMS - What is the main difference?

Muskan Tongia, Content Writter


Whether you're developing a website for yourself or you've been given the task of standing one up for work you've probably known about a content management system or "CMS" that is its abbreviated term. A content management system is a critical part of a new age website permitting an application or group of a number of applications of computerized content to be overseen without coding or developing new pages. 

Everything from your composed content to your designs is overseen through this framework and takes into account easy management of your site. While there are many kinds of content management systems, there are truly just two significant types available that can be handily referred to, traditional CMSs like WordPress and headless CMSs like Contentful. 

Every one of these solutions is reasonably relying upon your circumstance, design, and long-term content management objectives. For certain sites, a traditional CMS is a fine option. For other people, a headless CMS will be the ideal option.

Let us discuss the Headless CMS and traditional CMS in detail.

Headless CMS and traditional CMS are comparable because of their capacity to distribute content quickly. Nonetheless, while the traditional variation has a fixed frontend - generally a single website under a domain - headless CMSs are isolated from the distributing segment for every architecture.

Traditional CMS

Traditional content management systems like WordPress, Drupal, and Joomla are the driving force to revolutionize the web. When set up, even individuals with no coding abilities can undoubtedly add new content to their site or blog. To make this conceivable, this innovation (otherwise called "Monolithic CMS") has a frontend (what guests see) and a backend (where website administrators work). Once the frontend and hence the website design has been set up, new content can be added by means of the backend. 

With a traditional CMS, the content isn't accessible in the form of individual HTML reports or documents. All things considered, all of the content is stored in a database and stacked from that point when the website is visited. With WordPress and other CMSs, the frontend and backend are firmly connected and firmly coordinated with one another. Because of this reason, utilizing them is so natural and easy. In any case, the content must be moved to the corresponding front end. 

A traditional CMS is heavily centered around features of content management. These can incorporate digital asset management, version tracking, permissions, text formatting, WYSIWYG editors that empower advertisers to perceive how the content they're making will show up on the live site and that's just the beginning. 

Traditional CMSs are as yet fabulous systems that work for various deployment types. Assuming you're rigorously building a site for yourself, a small private business venture, or even an enterprise solution that doesn't have to share content with other digital properties, you might be best served by utilizing a traditional CMS. You can make it ready quickly and you'll have the option to deal with your site from a single source. 

It's likewise vital to take note that while a traditional CMS is normally a solitary site option, large numbers of them have plugins to enable multi-site and/or API access to impart digital assets to other external applications. Those plugins accompany their own difficulties and advantages. The principle of the LAMP stack, which stands for Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP is the one on which the Traditional content management systems are often based. Let us understand them one by one.

Linux: It is the operating system that is the best suited for servers.

Apache: This is a web server technology,  widely used on the Internet, and gives good results.

MySQL: This is one of the database management systems that is the most popular technology on the web.

PHP: This is the scripting language that enables the creation of dynamic websites.

LAMP stacks came out in the early-2000s alongside the primary content management systems. A major driver for both was the open-source community. All innovations of the LAMP stack can be utilized license-free.

Advantages of Traditional CMS

  • The whole site is served from a solitary system
  • Simple to deal with all content
  • Control front-end configuration and design through templates and themes
  • Enormous  communities for help
  • Lower technical barrier to entry passage

Disadvantages of Traditional CMS

  • Only creates content for the website (a similar content won't be served up on other devices)
  • Try not to continuously scale well
  • Requires developers who are CMS explicit
  • Limited flexibility
  • Additional time and cash are expected for support, maintenance, and upgrades

When Should You Use the Traditional CMS?

1. In a Website your Main Priority Is Usability

Assuming that your business' site barely needs any personalization, you don't anticipate changing its functionality or features and your greatest need is that it's quick and simple for you to add content sometimes, a traditional CMS is the best approach. With a traditional CMS, you'll get the advantage of built-in content management features, templates, and security.

2.  Development Support Access Is Limited

Few out of every odd organization can or needs to have innovation specialists on payroll. Traditional CMSes were expected to take care of low-tech business clients, making them an ideal fit for this situation.

3. Your Business Model does not have Omnichannel Digital Experiences 

Very much like each organization doesn't require on-call developers, numerous private ventures additionally don't have omnichannel, content-driven encounters incorporated into their promoting plans or plans of action. In case you do not need the additional adaptability and integration capacities that headless CMS stages incorporate, a traditional CMS could meet your business needs.

4. Lack of Team Resources

Utilize a traditional CMS in case your association doesn't have a (sufficiently large) group of engineers, can't manage the cost of external developers, or needs full command over the content, its display, and delivery

5. No Expertise Required

The upsides of a traditional CMS like WordPress are clear. It requires just a speck of specialized information from its clients. It additionally permits webpage administrators and content designers to control the presence of their site. For example, they won't require an engineer to change the textual style of blog article titles.

6. Basic Front and Back End Changes

Then again, customary CMSs accompany extensive impediments, particularly for more complex projects. The tight interconnection between the four functionalities — displaying, editing, delivering, and storing information — can make traditional CMSs blunder inclined and compromise site stability. 

7. Unsurprising Cost Structure

As the turn of events, the management, and update of the site should be possible by a small group that probably won't actually need on-request developers for integration, so it becomes easier to foresee the expense of running the site.

Headless CMS

With a headless CMS, there is no fixed frontend thus it just comprises a backend. Since increasingly more headless CMSs are made with a graphical UI/UX very much like the classic variants, content creation is comparatively basic. Generally speaking, headless CMSs are likewise presented as SaaS, which works on setup. With a headless CMS, the content is likewise stored in a database. In any case, the content isn't simply made accessible to a particular site. A huge variety of frontends can get to the information through simple interfaces. This is conceivable as the new age CMSs follow the Jamstack Principle:

  • JavaScript: The scripting language can be utilized to keep sites dynamic. This permits pictures to be reloaded or client input to be assessed.
  • APIs: Interfaces can be utilized to trade content with various frontends. Generally, a REST API is utilized for this reason, which depends on basic orders and is grasped by various applications.
  • Markup: The HTML markup language is the foundation of the Web. The language is normalized to the point that for all intents and purposes each application can deal with it.

These are exceptionally simple and highly standardized innovations that make it conceivable to give data to a wide variety of frontends. The design of the content is similarly free. While traditional CMSs as a rule make restrictive specifications while composing content to normalize publishing, this isn't true with headless CMSs.

Advantages of Headless CMS

  • Content is fit to be served on any device
  • The developers With the headless API can stress less over content and more about presentation
  • Front-end agnostic (A headless CMS couldn't care less about where the content is going or how it will be shown. It basically serves it up, permitting developers the opportunity to utilize their favored systems and devices.)
  • Basically, make content without stressing over being in a simple and single system that contains everything

Disadvantages of Headless CMS

  • Does not have content preview (Some systems permit you to create a review integration however this adds extra upfront overhead)
  • More upfront configuration/integration effort
  • Fostering a head/client (By "head/client", we mean the result and showing of the content that you have made (site, mobile application, and so forth)

When Should You Use the Headless CMS?

1. Distributing of Content Takes More Time

Assuming the CMS you are utilizing takes more time to distribute content than anticipated, now is the ideal time to move to Headless CMS. Trendy content management systems have progressed highlights and features that speed up the publishing system. For example, a decent UI/UX flexibility presented by Headless CMS empowers the making of highly responsive landing pages with more instinctive content management on each page.

2. Drawbacks of Marketing Tools

Does your CMS need advertising devices like SEO, automation, analytics, and so on, and isn't able to coordinate also? The time has come to change to an additional solid and powerful CMS that takes care representing things to future demands of the customers.

3. Absence of Flexibility and Scalability

A typical issue that is frequently seen with outdated CMSs is they don't permit nonstop changes and execution of new codes. This limits engineers to scale the item with the business requests.

4. Absence of Agility

Your CMS supplier must be agile to convey the best client experience and the system ought to be with the end goal that it very well may be created, adjusted, and changed rapidly.

5. Unclear Data Structure

Undefined information structure leads engineers into disarray with respect to the latest relevant point of interest. This creates undesirable setbacks and chances of faltering increase.

6. Absence of Creativity

Traditional CMS limits designers to make just a standard content presentation which prompts a dull client experience. Likewise, it doesn't permit the content to be utilized on different platforms which limits business presence on multi-channels.

7. Security

Headless CMSs are less helpless against DDoS assaults since the frontend is isolated from the backend. Headless CMSs have just a single access point, their APIs, so the surface area of safety attacks is more modest. This truly intends that there are fewer security concerns when picking a headless CMS. Dissimilar to headless CMSs, traditional CMSs are information base driven and are more powerless against DDoS and other security assaults.

We have taken a look at why you ought to think about utilizing a headless CMS, and how they tackle the issues of overseeing content for organizations and brands. With a headless CMS, you are situated for remarkable development, speed, and efficiency. We are aware that one solution cannot take care of all issues, but we truly want to believe that you could see the worth in weighing your choices with regard to picking the right CMS. Other than these two significant types, the flavor variations truly come down to preference. Picking one headless CMS over another, for instance, is much of an exercise in testing the interface and API to pick the one you and your content suppliers feel generally comfortable with.

Conclusion: Headless CMS Or Traditional CMS?

Concluding which is the right content management system relies a ton upon your project. In case you are only searching for a clear answer for executing a basic site or even a blog, the traditional CMS is as yet a decent choice. 

With WordPress particularly, you have lots of supportive plugins and themes available to you, which permit you to construct an expert site in a brief time frame, even without prior website design abilities. However, assuming you are intending to fill something other than a single site with content, it merits investigating the headless CMS. While it's not as simple to use as WordPress, the potential outcomes are more different. When set up, you can take care of a wide variety of systems with your content. While going with your decision, contemplate what's the future. Perhaps you need to begin with a basic site, yet later on, you likewise need to utilize applications. All things considered, you ought to choose a headless CMS now, so you don't need to change systems later, which could be risky. 

Regardless of whether you need to change your frontend innovation eventually, you are on the safe side with a headless CMS. Separating the frontend and backend implies a change is no issue. Having said that, you don't have to utilize a CMS. With static website generators, you can make lean and strong sites. In case you're not that keen on distributing new content regularly, an answer like this could be the ideal decision for you. With the best static website generators, you can make noteworthy sites from basic HTML reports.



Recent Posts